Students as agents in the creation of knowledge:

Incorporating voice and ownership through art-based projects

Author: Becky Beal, Professor of Kinesiology
Developed from many of my colleagues' work and feedback

As I reflect on my teaching and in what ways I can be more culturally inclusive, I have found that I need to be as in tune to my students as possible and to create spaces where I actively pay attention and respond to where they are coming from. For me, this means letting go of some of the faculty-driven structure of courses and allowing for (and expecting) the students to take ownership of the learning process. Incorporating art-based projects has been one successful means of facilitating this type of learning environment.

Below are my main goals for this type of assignment and a few examples from different courses.

Goals and upside:

  1. Encourages students to put their 'self' or voice into the project. They are the ones creating parameters of the art project and negotiating how they do the work.
  2. Enhances students' awareness that creating a position or an argument is a process grounded in thoughtful dialogue with each other but also with "academics" as represented by key concepts of course materials.
  3. Enhances the awareness that their positions are relational and, in turn, that knowledge is relational and political. In short, that knowledge has personal/political significance.

Downside:

  1. MESSY – process can be frustrating as there is no pre-determined "correct answers." Therefore, it's more "inefficient" and can be more challenging as it opposes the notion that being successful in class is simply "ticking off a box" or "jumping through a hoop."
  2. Also challenging as it requires consistent communication and negotiation with self and others about the logic and implications of one's position
  3. Not all students are comfortable in this environment, which is why in particular courses it is provided as an option to more traditional forms of research.